Anthropic and music publishers clash over fair use defense in AI copyright case
Anthropic asks a California judge to rule that training Claude on song lyrics is fair use, while publishers argue it harms their market.
- published on Newsmetry
- original source published
the public page opens no earlier than 15 minutes after we detect the story. approved stories may reach the api sooner. connect the api →
what happened
Anthropic asked a federal judge in California on Wednesday to find that using millions of song lyrics to train its Claude chatbot is protected under US fair use law, according to Reuters. Judge Eumi Lee did not rule at the San Jose hearing but pressed both sides on the question.
Music publishers Universal Music Group, Concord and ABKCO, who sued in 2023, say Claude can generate lyrics that compete with their catalogue. Their lawyer said Claude received nearly 120,000 requests for synthetic lyrics over six months. Anthropic countered that demand for lyrics has not fallen and that the publishers could not identify specific market harm.
why it matters
The fair use question could shape dozens of pending copyright cases against OpenAI, Meta Platforms and other AI developers. Earlier, one judge sided with Anthropic and another ruled for Meta while warning that AI training would often not qualify as fair use. The outcome matters for how investors assess legal risks facing AI companies.
tags
instruments
sources
- Anthropic, music publishers square off on 'fair use' defense in AI copyright case — Reuters, 21 October 2026 at 21:16 UTC
prepared by the newsmetry newsroom with ai assistance from the sources listed below. not investment advice.
the public page opens no earlier than 15 minutes after we detect the story. approved stories may reach the api sooner.
get stories in real time ↗